Others, including mainline astronomical investigators, have contended that our Sun has a companion brown dwarf companion star. We do likewise based on multi- source data and we call it Vulcan. Until now, only circumstantial evidence ranging from newspaper articles to ancient artifacts and even to postulated communications with extraterrestrial aliens have cited support this thesis. Our investigations have even lead to Vulcan's orbital parameters and modeled comet swarms forming with a 3:2 resonate period. Now, the computation of giant comet 2000 CR105's average orbital period has made it statistically certain that it is in just such a resonance with Vulcan. This is tantamount to the discovery of Vulcan itself.
Vulcan's theoretical period is 4969 years implying a corresponding resonate comet swarm period of 3312.7 years. Including Vulcan's mass and orbit in the solar system, CR105's period - averaged over two Vulcan periods - is 3319.3 years. Thus Vulcan's period is implied to be 4979.0 years. There are at least three other Vulcan related (Scatter Disc) objects which have yet to be analyzed in detail. Specifically, 2001 FP185 and 2002 GB332 appear to be in a similar 3:2 resonance and 1999 DP8 in a 4:1 resonance with Vulcan.
The implications of this discovery are astounding. (1) Earth at risk of frequent comet impacts from a passing comet swarms, but a passage of several clusters within this swarm may occur this century. (2) The first comet cluster may pass dangerously close to Earth around 2007. (3) Vulcan is near IRAS Object 1732+239. (4) The fringe web sites suggesting that a brown dwarf star exists within our solar system are generally valid. (5) Alien interactions with mankind warning of a comet threat and the existence of another major body (dark star) within our solar system are likely valid. (6) The unusual methods employed to compute the brown dwarf's orbit, employing the esoteric astrology of Avatars and the Dawn Of Mankind, are correct.
The new tenth planet, UB313 (Xena), orbital inclination (43.993o) indicates that it may have been a planet of a brown dwarf star. Astronomers Kenyon and Bromley say (Nature, 12/02/2004):
that only the detection of objects with orbits inclined 40 degrees or more from the plane of the ecliptic will prove the existence of 'alien' planetoids.The Kuiper Belt extends from about Neptune's orbit (30 AU) to about 55 AU. Scatter Disk objects, lying beyond these have been know since 1999, (e. g. six with inclinations >30o and 1999 CY118 with inclination 41o). Astronomers Morbidelli and Levison have also speculated that 2000 CR105 may be associated with an 'alien' brown dwarf star. Specifically:
Gladman et al. have shown that 2000 CR105 could not have been a normal member of the scattered disk . . ."While they consider that the brown dwarf star was merely passing by our Sun, we contended that it (Vulcan) is a member of our solar system. XR190 has an inclination similar to Vulcan's (47o) and:
"(4) encounters with other stars that perturbed the orbits of some of the solar system's trans-Neptunian planetesimals, and (5) the capture of extra-solar planetesimals from low-mass stars or brown dwarfs encountering the Sun. Of all these mechanisms, the ones giving the most satisfactory results are those related to the passage of stars (4 and 5).
2004 XR190, however, follows a nearly circular path. And it is too distant to have come into direct contact with Neptune, traveling between 52 and 62 AU from the Sun. Its orbit is also too circular - and too small - to have been tilted by a passing star . . . another possible explanation - that the Sun had a twin . . . that could excite inclinations without exciting the eccentricities.
The orbit of
Vulcan was first defined in 1997 and a
precise value was obtained in 2002.
Vulcan's mass was finally accurately determined 2004. Vulcan's theoretical
period (4969.0 +/- 11.5 years) if it is IRAS (InfraRed Astronomical Survey)
Object 1732+239, 4972.1 +/- 27.4 years if it is not.
Figure 1. The Geometries Of Vulcan, The Kuiper Belt, The Comet Swarms And The Solar System.
Figure 1 illustrates how Vulcan draws bodies from beyond the Kuiper belt into 3:2 resonate orbits. Some of these generate comets while Vulcan is about 444 AU from the Sun, and these fall into Sun grazing orbits. They break up rounding the Sun forming comet swarms. If Vulcan is the IRAS object cited, the theoretical comet swarm period is 3312.7 +/- 7.7 years. Often, when these comet swarms pass through the inner solar system, some of these comets often hit Earth causing major weather changes.
The geo-climatological data tends to support the theoretical Vulcan Orbital period of 4969.0 +/- 11.5 (2 sigma) years (assuming Vulcan is IRAS Object 1732+239) or 4972.1 +/- 27.4 (2 sigma) if it is not the IRAS object. The mean comet swarm orbital period from 38 measurements of geo-climatological changes thought to be due to impacts from comets in the clusters found in the A' & A, B' and B swarms is 3332.6 +/- 119 years.. The average swarm period derived from all comet swarms is 3312.4 +/- 113 years.Thus, both the comet swarm's period and Vulcan's period can be estimated from geo-climatological data.
3:2 resonate orbits abound in the solar system. Even Pluto, which is locked in a 3:2 orbit resonance with Neptune, may be a giant comet. Approximately 1/4 of the known trans-Neptunian objects are Plutinos (also in a 3:2 orbit resonance with Neptune). They lie in a band at 39 AU and have orbital inclinations up to 20o, while most of the other Kuiper Belt Objects (KBOs) are further from the Sun.
A surprising result of the new observational work is that many of the distant objects are in or near the 3:2 mean motion resonance with Neptune. This means that they complete 2 orbits around the sun in the time it takes Neptune to complete 3 orbits. The same resonance is also occupied by Pluto. To mark the dynamical similarity with Pluto, we have christened these objects as "Plutinos" (little Plutos).
Probably, the 3:2 resonance acts to stabilize the Plutinos against gravitational perturbations by Neptune. Resonant objects in elliptical orbits can approach the orbit of Neptune without ever coming close to the planet itself, because their perihelia (smallest distance from the sun) preferentially avoid Neptune. In fact, it is well known that Pluto's orbit crosses inside that of Neptune, but close encounters are always avoided. This property is also shared by a number of the known Plutinos (e.g. 1993 SB, 1994 TB, 1995 QY9), further enhancing the dynamical similarity with Pluto.
The orbit evolution of 32 Plutinos over 100 million year has been investigated.
The orbits of thirty-two Plutinos that are presently in the 3:2 mean motion resonance with Neptune have been integrated numerically and accurately to 108 years into the future. Fourteen of them are found in unstable orbits after encountering Neptune or Pluto. Six of eighteen Plutinos with stable orbits are in the Kozai resonance or around its separatrix zone.Similarly, there are objects called Twotinos in a 2:1 resonance with Neptune. Other Trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs), other than Plutinos but in near resonance with Neptune, includes 1 near the 4:5 resonance, 3 near the 3:4 resonance, 2 near the 3:5 resonance, 3 near the 4:7 resonance, 6 near the 1:2 resonance, and 7 (like 2002 TC302) are near the 2:5 resonance.
Inner Solar System objects have been found that are dynamically analogues to Plutinos. Earth, Venus, and Mars, have resonant asteroids dynamically similar to the Plutinos of Neptune. Even Mercury is locked into a 3:2 spin-orbit resonance (it rotates three times for every two solar orbits).
2000 CR105 was observed between 2000/02/06 and 2002/02/14. It is one of about 19 Scatter Disc objects with aphelions between Vulcan's perihelion (134 AU) and aphelion (448). Just to include it, the definition of Scatter Disc Objects had to be extended. CR105's, 2001 FP185's and 2002 GB332's periods are similar to the modeled comet swarm's period and the impact data delta's found from the geoclimatological data. Moreover, 1999 DP8, and maybe 1999 CZ118, are in a nominal 4:1 resonance with Vulcan . See Table 1. Astronomers have proven that the giant planets weakly affects CR105's orbit. The Jovian planets start influencing these objects' as their perihelions approach Neptune's orbital radius. A second force, Vulcan's gravity, acts like a "shepherding satellite" bunching the Sun fragmented comets/swarms when they are near aphelion and in high orbital inclinations. In this case, Vulcan will increase or decrease the objects orbital period until a 'resonance' is created. This resonance effect is generated until the giant planets tug the orbital inclination away from Vulcan's influence.
2 sigma errors
|Period (yrs)||4969.0 +30/- 24||3313 (15) +/- 8 (18)||3316.7||3234.2||3433.7||434.98||1246|
|Ecc.||0.537 +0.09/-0.04||~ 1.0||0.801||0.838||0.849||0.111||0.700|
|Inc.||48.44o +3o/- 9o||?||22.7o||11.932o||30.8o||46.7o||38.4o|
|Asc. Node||189.0o +/- 1.3o||?||128.28o||117.0o||179.3o||252.4o||323.0o|
|Arg. Of Peri||257.8o +6o/-13.5o||?||316.6o||37.0o||7.0o||284.1o||13.9o|
Interaction of the known planets with the giant comet 2000 CR105 and Vulcan was undertaken with the LONGSHOT numerical integration program. The purpose of the LONGSHOT algorithm is to quickly and accurately define the position of solar bodies (e. g. planets and comets) over long periods of time. The ultimate purpose of the LONGSHOT program is to derive the drift of the Kepler elements describing the orbits of the know planets. The ephemeris generated was compared against Quinn's model for Pluto reference 34 and found to remain similar for 2.7 million years (MY).
The LONGSHOT numerical integrator was run with a time increment of 25 days and with CR105, the Sun, the Jovian planets and with (or without) Vulcan in the planet and comet menu suite. The software showed no sensitivity to shorter time intervals as long as these bodies were employed. The software computed the semi-major axis and these values were extracted and converted into orbital period. Then these periods were averaged over the time span of two Vulcan orbital periods. Runs were also made at two CR105orbital period extremes, with Vulcan present.
The uncorrected (for Jovian planets) orbital period of 2000 CR105, about 3366.6545 +/- 19.53 (1 sigma) years, is close to the anticipated period of the postulated comet swarms operating in a 3:2 resonance with Vulcan's period. Detailed data similar to CR105's is not available on the other Scatter Disc Objects in resonate orbit. The numerical integration simulations show that CR105's orbit was highly inclined like Vulcan's, but has now been 'cranked' down into a lower inclination. CR105's orbit never carries it near to the known solar system, especially the first eight planets. The simulations indicate that CR105's orbit is still being slightly modified by the Jovian planets when averaged over two Vulcan orbital periods, or three CR105 orbital rotations. Orbital cranking was modeled (with Vulcan included) over +/-2.7 million years (MY) and it varied up to 65.2o/53o respectively with the lowest inclination of 15.2o attained some 417,522 years in the future. Its resonance with Vulcan's period continued and its most circular orbit (e = 0.488) occurred 1.93 MY ago. 2.21 MY ago (Pleistocene begins) the last inclination above 53o ended. Modeling without Vulcan showed only slight orbital inclination changes over +/-2.7 MY.
CR105's average orbit (Table 2) is made with Vulcan, the Jovian Planets, and the Sun's influence. The span utilized the IRAS satellite object (1732+239). (See reference 5).
Nine bright point-like sources out of 8709 objects that were analyzed in the IRAS mini-survey. They had no counterparts in a variety of catalogs of non- stellar objects. They were multi-scanned in multiple satellite's orbital periods, days and characterized as being bright in the far but faint in the near infrared. They are scattered about the mini-survey area and do not appeared clustered around the ecliptic or galactic plane.This IRAS object, believed to be Vulcan, lead to an orbital period of 4969 years. Another new one, computed by multiplying CR105's average orbital period by 3/2 (4979 years), was also evaluated. Two similar runs, see Table 3, are without Vulcan's influence but with the Jovian planets' and the Sun's.
|MEASURED PERIOD||AVERAGE PERIOD||RUN||Span - years|
|3366.6545||3319.3416 (or 3319.4262)||Current||0.000 to 9938.398 (or 9958.932)|
|3366.6545 + 19.53 (- 19.53)||3340.637 (3303.735)||Current||0.000 to 9938.398|
|3366.6545||3316.7022*||Current||0.000 to 9938.398|
The first runs listed in Table 2 cover from the current time backward two Vulcan theoretical periods (9938 years). The second runs listed cover the same span, but began about a thousand years earlier. The differences in the cases with and without Vulcan is 2.64. Thus, only the first case truly reflects the average period of CR105 over two Vulcan revolutions, 3/2 X 3312.7 = 9938 (or 3/2 X 3319.34 = 9958) years. Vulcan only influenced CR105's period by 2.64 years over the last ten thousand years.
The 3:2 resonate orbital period ratio of Neptune to Pluto, taken from Quinn's data over the last 3 million years (MY), was examined and a mean value of 1.49736 +/- 0.00561 was obtained from eight samples. A similar value was obtained by comparing Vulcan's theoretical period (4969 years) to CR105's period over the previous 1.46 MY (a little risky as astronomical models seldom go back this far) and a value of 1.49776 +/- 0.00896 was obtained from ten samples. Vulcan's period was adjusted to 4979 years based on the 3319.34 year value and a similar 1.50091 +/- 0.01020 value was found. These latter two results correspond to an average CR105's period of 3317.63 and 3317.31 years respectively. Vulcan only influences CR105's average period by 0.5 to 1.0 years over 1.46 MY.
Vulcan's theoretical period is 4969.0 +/- 11.5 years if it is IRAS object or 4972.1 +/- 27.4 if it is not. The corresponding theoretical comet swarm periods are 3312.7 +/- 7.7 years if Vulcan is this IRAS Object or 3314.7 +/- 18.3 years if it is not. The 3319.3 +/- 20 year (one Sigma) average period of CR105 is only 6.6 years or 4.6 years removed from these two corresponding values, thus it is within the error bounds of either case. Vulcan's theoretical error bounds are 2 sigma values. Thus, we cannot resolve whether or not this IRAS Object is Vulcan. But the 3319.34-year value is suspiciously close to the IRAS derived theoretical value. Thus, Vulcan must be fairly close to IRAS Object 1732+239.
Volcanic activity is induced by comet impacts and climatic responses postulated. Volcanic eruptions have been reported and dates of 7810 and 7910 BC found. These correspond to the passage of the B comet swarm two Vulcan revolutions ago. Projecting these forwards by the 9958-year value found herein (two Vulcan periods), corresponding future impact dates should be 2048 and 2148 AD. The former value is close to the predicted impact event found in the Bible Code data (2044-45). This impact is anticipated to generate a sixty-mile crater in Canada and a smaller one in Ohio.
The Pioneer and Voyager space probes and the IRAS satellite sought a dead
star and Planet X.
Figure 2. A Picture From The 1987 New Science And Invention Encyclopedia.
Figure 2 (from a Children's Encyclopedia!) illustrates this Pioneer search for Planet X and a 'Dead Star'. In a section on space probes, the encyclopedia shows the paths of the two Pioneer probes were to 'triangulate' on the gravitational affects. It shows the Earth, the Sun, a dead star (at 50 billion miles or 538 AU) and a tenth planet (at 4.7 billion miles or 50 AU). The Hill star map (19 September 1961) and a later alien encounter (6 October 1974) clearly show the presence of an unseen solar companion. Unfortunately, the dead star turned out to be in the direction of Pioneer 11.
The Pioneer story has some interesting 'cracks'. For Example (Italics are our comments)
It began with the search for Planet X. By 1979, Pioneer 10 had accomplished its original mission to become the first Earth-born spacecraft to explore Jupiter and was on its way out of our solar system, flying toward the star Aldebaran - a destination it should reach some two million years from now.
On its way out, Pioneer 10 became a useful partner in an experiment of celestial mechanics. By closely monitoring its trajectory, scientists might detect an unexpected gravitational tug that could betray the existence of the long- hypothesized Planet X. Based largely on unexplained motions in the orbits of Uranus and Neptune, several 20th-century astronomers had suggested the existence of an undiscovered world at the edge of our solar system.
John D. Anderson, a veteran JPL scientist, took on the task of studying the Pioneer 10 and 11 radio signal data for any sign of Planet X. His search had come up empty. For this reason, among others, John and his team at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory became convinced that the chance of discovering a 10th planet was slim, as they reported in the May/June 1999 issue of The Planetary Report. But in early 1980, John and his team began to see signs of something else-something quite unexpected. While searching for Planet X, we noticed that the tracking data did not quite fit with the existing solar system model. They showed an anomalous acceleration-in this case, an acceleration backward. It did not match any expected Planet X force, and we couldn't immediately explain it. When theoretical models do not fit experimental data, standard scientific practice is to find a reason for the mismatch. Therefore, we embarked on a program to study the anomalous acceleration
The puzzle is that Pioneer 10 is slowing more quickly than it should.
It was initially suggested that this might be due to the force from a tiny gas leak or that it was being pulled off course by the gravity of an unseen Solar System object.
The mystery deepened further when an analysis of the trajectory being followed by its sister spacecraft, Pioneer 11, launched in 1973, showed that it too was being subjected to the same mysterious effect.
But Pioneer 11 is on the opposite side of the Solar System from Pioneer 10, about 22 billion km (about 14 billion miles) away. This means the effect cannot be the gravitational effect of some unseen body.
But others have dismissed this as being too fanciful, arguing that if the Pioneer anomaly was really indicative of a change in our understanding of gravity, then it would be apparent in the orbits of the planets around the Sun - which it is not.
LOS ALAMOS, N.M., Sept. 24, 1998 -- A team of planetary scientists and physicists has identified a tiny, unexplained sunward acceleration in the motions of the Pioneer 10, Pioneer 11 and Ulysses spacecraft.
Pioneer 10 was officially tracked until March 1997, when it was some six billion miles away (64 AU) from the sun. (Pioneer 10 is still transmitting, and occasional additional radio Doppler data is provided to the research team.)
Pioneer 11, due to a radio failure, last sent useful radio Doppler transmissions in October 1990, when it was less than three billion miles from the sun (about 32 AU, about Pluto's perihelion). Ulysses has been tracked on its looping flight out of the ecliptic and around the sun's poles.
Trusty and reliable Los Alamos National Laboratory is operated by the University of California for the U.S. Department of Energy.
Which leaves open staggering possibilities that would force wholesale reprinting of all physics books:
Data from the Galileo and Ulysses spacecraft suggest the anomaly may have affected them, too. But neither has been far enough from the Sun -- the dominant source of gravity in the solar system -- to firmly distinguish any possible discrepancy from noise in the data, Turyshev says. Galileo was crashed into Jupiter last year, and Ulysses will never go farther than it has.
- Invisible dark matter is tugging at the probes
- Other dimensions create small forces we don't understand
- Gravity works differently than we think
Could both the Pioneer and Voyager space probe efforts have been launched to find and investigate the Dead Star? See Figure 3 (and Sitchin's GENESIS REVISITED, pages 314 – 332). Assuming it is at or near IRAS object 1732+239, the Pioneers were first launched to find its nominal Right Ascension (RA) and then the Voyagers were launched to find its declination once it was localized.
Figure 3. Locations of Pioneer and Voyager space probes.
|PROBE/TARGET||RT. ASC.||DEC.||RANGE||HELIO. LONG.||HELIO. DEC.|
|Pioneer 10||5.057 hrs||25.83 deg||89 AU||77.20 deg||3.01 deg|
|Pioneer 11||18.596 hrs||-8.57 deg||70 AU||279.06 deg||14.59 deg|
|Voyager 1||17.076 hrs||12.13 deg||97 AU||253.35 deg||34.78 deg|
|IRAS 1732+239||17.5476 hrs||23.9433 deg||448** AU||260.78 deg||47.17 deg|
|Voyager 2||19.680 hrs||-52.26 deg||78 AU||287.50 deg||-30.35 deg|
It is highly unlikely that all the physics books have to be rewritten due to a change in the force of gravity. The argument that the known planets would be affected by this 'change' in the force of gravity is reasonable because Pioneer 11's radio transmitter 'failed' when it was about the distance of Pluto's perigee (30 AU) and now Pioneer 10 is beyond the distance of Pluto's aphelion (50 AU) . If the force of gravity were changing, it would be apparent in Pluto's (and maybe Neptune's) orbit.
It appears that both the Pioneer and Voyager space probes were launched to find a large planet or a small brown dwarf star (the Dead Star) orbiting our Sun. By 1977, it appeared to be localized between 253o and 288o heliocentric longitude. The Pioneers were virtually in the ecliptic plane. The Voyagers were launched to define the brown dwarf's heliocentric declination and mass.
The InfraRed Astronomical Survey (IRAS) satellite, launched in 1982, likely found the brown dwarf star (Vulcan). If initially reported, it is likely IRAS object 1732+239. The IRAS astronomers must have been jubilant. The initial estimate of 50 billion miles comes from standard dynamical astronomy based on the statistics of passing stars during the past lifetime of our solar system. Van Flandern (Reference  - 'Dark Matter, Missing Planets & New Comets', p. 313; also pp. 335-36) estimates that statistically, a few passing stars would approach within 40 times (2000 AU) Pluto's distance of the Sun over the life of the solar system. They would tend to perturb any outermost planets, located ten (46.5 billion miles) to forty times more distant than Pluto) into planet-crossing orbits. Eventually, these would interact with the Jovian planets and be ejected from the solar system. Vulcan never gets farther from the Sun than 450 AU (41.9 billion miles), about 9 times Pluto's far point from the Sun.
Their IRAS astronomers' jubilation spilled over into the NEWS media who reported is as follows.
Allegedly, all the IRAS infrared sources have been investigated and explained away, even the one favored to be Vulcan, ( IRAS Object 1732+239). Astronomers working on the IRAS team have verified that there is No Tenth Planet Yet From IRAS. But notice that none of these IRAS objects were checked for any angular motion characteristic of a moving 'planet' or 'brown dwarf' star orbiting in our solar system. The admission of a brown dwarf's presence would be tantamount to admitting to a possible 3:2 comet (swarm) resonance with its period, as is possible in 40% of the nearby double star systems.
Upon examining these reports, it seems clear that astronomers were searching for both a Planet X and a Vulcan like brown dwarf star back in the early 1980's. Specifically,
Astronomers at the U.S. Naval Observatory (USNO) are using a powerful computer to identify the best target zones, and a telescopic search will follow soon after. ... Van Flandern thinks the tenth planet may have between two and five Earth masses and lie 50 to 100 astronomical units from the Sun. (An astronomical unit is the mean distance between Earth and the Sun.) His team also presumes that, like Pluto's, the plane of the undiscovered body's orbit is tilted with respect to that of most other planets, and that its path around the Sun is highly elliptical. The orbit of UB313, the new tenth planet, ranges from 38.2 to 97.6 astronomical units. It is in a highly elliptical orbit of eccentricity 0.4378 and highly inclined to the ecliptic at 43.993o
A pair of American spacecraft may help scientists detect what could be a 10th planet or a giant object billions of miles away, the national Aeronautics and Space Administration said Thursday. Scientists at the space agency's Ames Research Center said the two spacecraft, Pioneer 10 and 11, which are already farther into space than any other man-made object, might add to knowledge of a mysterious object believed to be beyond the solar system's outermost known planets. The space agency said that persistent irregularities in the orbits of Uranus and Neptune "suggest some kind of mystery object is really there" with its distance depending on what it is. If the mystery object is a new planet, it may lie five billion miles beyond the outer orbital ring of known planets, the space agency said. If it is a dark star type of object, it may be 50 billion miles beyond the known planets; if it is a black hole, 100 billion miles. Vulcan (our Sun's brown dwarf companion star) passed aphelion in 1970 at a distance of about 448 AU, or 42 billion miles.
According to John Anderson of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., this odd behavior suggests that the sun has an unseen companion, a dark star gravitationally bound to it but billions of miles away. ... A companion star would tug the outer planets, not just Uranus and Neptune, says Thomas Van Flandern of the U.S Naval Observatory. ... To resolve the question, NASA is staying tuned to Pioneer 10 and 11, the planetary probes that are flying through the dim reaches of the solar system on opposite sides of the sun. Outer planets(?) beyond Neptune.
Three possibilities stand out: First, the object could be a planet - but any world large and close enough to affect the orbits of Uranus and Neptune should already have been spotted. Searchers might have missed the planet, though, if it's unusually dark or has an odd orbit. ... . Vulcan's orbit is inclined unusually high to the ecliptic (at 48.44o +3o/- 9o) where it can elude discovery.
Recent calculations by the United States Naval Observatory have confirmed the orbital perturbation exhibited by Uranus and Neptune, which Dr. Thomas C Van Flandern, and a colleague, Dr. Richard Harrington, calculate that the 10th planet should be two to five times more massive than Earth and have a highly elliptical orbit that takes it some 5 billion miles beyond that of Pluto. The newly discovered (and secreted) tenth planet is in a highly elliptical (eccentricity 0.4378) orbit that takes it from 3.5 to 9.1 billion miles from the Sun.
So mysterious is the object that astronomers do not know if it is a planet, a giant comet, a nearby "protostar" that never got hot enough to become a star, a distant galaxy so young that it is still in the process of forming its first stars or a galaxy so shrouded in dust that none of the light cast by its stars ever gets through. The mystery body was seen twice by the infrared satellite as it scanned the northern sky from last January to November, when the satellite ran out of the supercold helium that allowed its telescope to see the coldest bodies in the heavens. The second observation took place six months after the first and suggested the mystery body had not moved from its spot in the sky near the western edge of the constellation Orion in that time. "It's not incoming mail," Cal Tech's Neugebauer said. "I want to douse that idea with as much cold water as I can." Then, what is it? What if it is as large as Jupiter and so close to the sun it would be part of the solar system? Conceivably, it could be the 10th planet astronomers have searched for in vain. It also might be a Jupiter-like star that started out to become a star eons ago but never got hot enough like the sun to become a star.
(ITEM 127)The distance from earth of a mysterious object in space was reported incorrectly in some editions yesterday. The correct figure is 50 billion miles. Vulcan is our Sun's unlit brown dwarf companion star and aided our Sun in forming planets.
Shrouded from the sun's light, mysteriously tugging at the orbits of Uranus and Neptune, is an unseen force that astronomers suspect may be Planet X - a 10th resident of the Earth's celestial neighborhood. Last year, the infrared astronomical satellite (IRAS), circling in a polar orbit 560 miles from the Earth, detected heat from an object about 50 billion miles away that is now the subject of intense speculation. "All I can say is that we don't know what it is yet," says Gerry Neugesbeuer, director of the Palomar Observatory for the California Institute of Technology. Scientists are hopeful that the one-way journeys of the Pioneer 10 and 11 space probes may help to locate the nameless body.
It appears that both the infrared astronomical satellite (IRAS) and the Pioneer 10 & 11 space probes were launched to discover Vulcan. Vulcan is expected of magnitude 20.5 - 21.1, about the same magnitude of many of the IRAS objects found by the infrared astronomical satellite (IRAS). The Hubble Space Telescope has seen objects as faint as magnitude 29 - 30. The launch (planned around 1986) of the Hubble was delayed to make sure it could be safely delivered.
Vulcan (IRAS Object 1732+239) must have stood out like a 'sore thumb' in the infrared. It is common astronomical knowledge that most binary stars orbit each other in elliptical orbits. But it is not commonly known is that some of these orbits support a 3:2 comet resonance with the binary partner. See comment two. Here three or four of our nearest ten binary star systems may support such a resonance. Any astronomer, skilled in celestial mechanics, would be aware of this possibility. So the existence of a 'dead star' in our solar system (Figure 2) implies a nominal 40% chance that the inner planets of our solar system would sometimes be subject to bombardment by comet swarms in resonate orbits just as Crop Circle T367 seems to indicate. The jubilant IRAS team may have been largely unaware of the possibility that the object IRAS sought would verify this threat to Earth.
Most of the nearby star systems are close together, so the comets in resonate orbits would be rapidly swept out of these solar systems by a variety of means. However, in our solar system, Vulcan, the 'dead star', draws Kuiper belt bodies into the inner solar system. These bodies crumble rounding the Sun producing comet swarms. These comet swarms would stay around for several million years. Some of these comets would impact Earth causing massive natural catastrophes. Figure 2 clearly associates the 'tenth planet' along with the 'dead star' and that, in turn, indicates Earth's vulnerability to natural comet impact catastrophes.
Astronomers are beginning to suspect that some Kuiper belt objects are planets
of another star. See:
Scenarios for the Origin of the Orbits of the Trans-Neptunian Objects 2000
CR105 and 2003 VB12
(4) encounters with other stars that perturbed the orbits of some of the solar
system's trans-Neptunian planetesimals, and (5) the capture
of extra solar planetesimals from low-mass stars or brown dwarfs encountering
Sun. Of all these mechanisms, the ones giving the most
satisfactory results are those related to the passage of stars (4 and 5).
Modeling of encounters between such stars as our Sun and a brown dwarf have
already been attempted. See:
Stand Back CSI, The Astronomers Of CFA May Have Solved A Mystery Of Cosmic
The computer models indicate thousands, possibly millions, of alien objects were
stripped from the passing star. ...
During the simulations, the Sun captures up to one-third of the star's objects,
adding them to the Kuiper Belt. In fact, the models provide a 10 percent chance
that Sedna was captured during the flyby. "It's possible that some of the
objects in our solar system actually formed around another star," Kenyon says.
The new 'tenth' planet (2003 UB313)'s orbital inclination (44o) maybe why
its existence was kept
Kenyon, Bromley, and fellow astronomers will proceed to search for objects with highly inclined orbits. Because only captured objects have orbits inclined more than 40o, detection of such objects would confirm the presence of foreign objects in our solar system
"It is already known that the body was discovered in 2003 by the designation
2003 UB313. Why is it now stated it was spotted in "January", inferring that
the discovery occurs in 2005?"
Of course, we are being told that they were not suspecting to find any planets with high orbital inclinations
Object Bigger Than Pluto Discovered, Called 10th Planet
"They had hoped to hold back for longer, but a secure website containing details of the discovery was recently hacked and the hacker threatened to release the information.
"For Brown, the discovery is particularly satisfying. Five and a half years ago, he bet fellow astronomer Sabine Airieau five bottles of good champagne that he would find a Kuiper Belt object larger than Pluto by the end of last year. In December, having failed, he bought the champagne to send to her. Then 2003 UB313 was spotted on 8 January."
The object is inclined by a whopping 45 degrees to the main plane of the solar system, where most of the
other planets orbit. That's why it eluded discovery: nobody was looking there
until now, Brown said. Of course, they might
accidentally find Vulcan whose predicted orbital inclinations range from about
40o to 52o.
Of course, the 'real story' about the hasty announcement and the reports of
"hacking is here".
The team had hoped to analyze the data further before announcing the planet but were forced to do so Friday evening because word had leaked out, Brown said. "Somebody hacked our website," he said, and "they were planning to make [the data] public."
Are there others that are worried about a large planet in our outer solar
system? Well, maybe so:
Is There a Large Planet Orbiting Beyond Neptune?
A comet orbiting in the most distant regions of our solar system has an orbit
that isn't where astronomers expect it to be - given the gravitational forces
that are expected to govern the path of bodies in these regions. Something is
apparently causing this comet's orbit to diverge from what would otherwise be
XR190 (47o) was accidentally found when it happened to be passing
through the ecliptic.
The comet (2000 CR105) is rather large (over 400 km in diameter) and was discovered in February 2000. Its orbit is highly elliptical. 2000 CR105 is currently 53 AU away from the sun. . . . Recent observations show that this comet's orbit is much larger than previously calculated leading astronomers to suspect that another large gravitational influence is affecting the comet's orbit - and influence that may still be exerted to the present day. . . . The team also suggests that the perturbation of 2000 CR105 could be caused by a "resident planet" of a size somewhere between our Moon and Mars that formed in these outer regions well beyond the orbit of Pluto a distance of 10 billion kilometers from the sun.
That suggests many more such objects remain undiscovered, tilted at orbits where
most surveys do not search for them . . . Levison told New Scientist. He
ventures another possible explanation - that the Sun had a
twin and that both stars followed circular orbits around
each other. "That could excite inclinations without exciting the
eccentricities," he says. "However, this idea creates more
problems than it solves, by far." It
The case of circumstantial evidence of a successful recent search for a brown dwarf star in our own solar system seems strong. It appears that the main purpose of the Pioneer & Voyager space probes, the IRAS (InfraRed Astronomical Survey) program and even the Hubble space telescope may have been this effort. The 'backwards' tug on Pioneer 10 is due to the brown dwarf's gravitational pull since it is almost directly opposite IRAS 1732+239. Pioneer 11's radio stopped March 1997 and there have been no reports of Voyager discovering any 'gravitational anomalies' (Voyager's thruster usage conveniently makes measuring such a small effect impossible). The IRAS system would have almost certainly picked up the brown dwarf' infrared signature if it were less than 50 billion miles away (Vulcan is estimated to be about 42 billion miles) but there is no proof that this is IRAS Object 1732+239. And the Hubble could easily spot this magnitude 21 object since it can detect other objects as faint as magnitude 30. Since a brown dwarf star has about a 40% probability of generating threatening comet swarms in a 3:2 orbit resonance, there is a motive for the results of these searches to have been suppressed.
The strong similarities between the orbital period of comet 2000 CR105 and that of Vulcan's predicted comet swarms operating in a 3:2 resonance with it permits a computation of the probability that these objects are related. Here, we are assuming that the distributions are Gaussian and the two methods to determine the periods involved are independent of each other. The orbital periods involved are:
x = Absolute value of (Pa - Pb)/(Sigmaa2 + Sigmab2)1/2
Pr(a,b) = 2[1 - F(x)]
Consider the case for determining the probability, Pr(CR105,IRAS), that the orbital period of is related to a theoretical 3:2 resonate orbital period determined using the IRAS point. However, there are two different values for PCR105 depending on whether the center values are computed from the two Vulcan averaged 3366 years value or by averaging the two extreme [+/-19.5 years] values. Thus,
x = Absolute value of (PCR105 - PIRAS)/(SigmaCR1052 + SigmaIRAS2)1/2
x = Absolute value of (3319.3 [or 3321.1] - 3312.7)/(19.52 + 3.852)1/2 = 6.6/19.88 = 0.3320 [or 0.4225]
Pr(CR105,IRAS) = 2[1 - F(x)] = 2(1 - 0.6300) = 0.74 [or 0.67] (74% or [67%])
Similarly, the probability, Pr(CR105,NO IRAS), that the orbital period of CR105 is related to a theoretical 3:2 resonate orbital period without using the IRAS point, but by using the Dawn Of Mankind time, about 55,950 +/-500 BC, is:
x = Absolute value of (3319.3 [or 3321.1] - 3314.7)/(19.52 + 9.152)1/2 = 4.6/21.54 = 0.2136 [or 0.2971]
Pr(CR105,NO IRAS) = 2[1 - F(x)] = 2(1 - 0.5843) = 0.83 or [0.77] (83% or [77%])
The probability, Pr(IRAS,NO IRAS), comet resonate period is the same whether computed by using the IRAS point as Vulcan or its location limited by the Dawn Of Mankind data that can be computed. However, since these computations are not completely independent, this value may be questionable.
x = Absolute value of (3314.7 - 3312.7)/(3.852 + 9.152)1/2 = 2.0/9.269 = 0.2158
Pr(IRAS,NO IRAS) = 2[1 - F(x)] = 2(1 - 0.5855) = 0.83 (83%)
Pr(CR105,NO IRAS) implies that there are 5  out of 6  chances that comet CR105's period is in a 3:2 resonance with Vulcan's theoretical period, thus validating how the latter was derived, specifically;
The implications that large comet CR105's period is in a 3:2 ratio with Vulcan's theoretical period are staggering. Any Pr(a,b) > 0.4 means that the two physical quantities are effectively related. Pr(IRAS,NO IRAS) and Pr(CR105,NO IRAS) are both about equal and far greater than 0.4. Pr(CR105,NO IRAS)'s greater value indicates that the detailed method used in deriving Vulcan's theoretical period is similarly valid. Specifically, the items validated (and used in the derivation) include:
Vulcan's existence was likely revealed by human/alien contact. A specific case that has indicated its existence is found in an alien description of our solar system (Figure 5A in our 1999 Paper - acquired 6 October 1974). It was also depicted as a 'star' in the Hill Star Map (acquired 19 September 1961) and as analyzed in Figure 3 1997 Paper. But the alien derived Akkadian Seal and Crop Circle T367 have provided concrete information about Vulcan's mass and location.
A mathematical fit of the Sun and planets (Uranus, Neptune, Jupiter and Saturn) found on the 4500 year old Akkadian seal shows that it is illustrating planets of our solar system and includes a Vulcan of 141 +/-35 Earth masses. See Figure 4. This is the mass used for Vulcan when computing the average period for comet 2000 CR105. The Akkadian Seal is believed to be of alien origin because ancient mankind would have no way to compute planetary masses, let alone even seeing Uranus or Neptune.
The same nominal mass for Vulcan (0.05% solar mass) can also be obtained from T367 if it is assumed to be in the ecliptic plane. See Figure 5. This crop circle is believed to be of alien origin because it depicts an 'offset' in the solar system's barycenter. There is no commonly known reason for this offset. It is in the direction of IRAS object 1732+239. Pr(CR105, IRAS) indicates that this IRAS object is near Vulcan. This orientation also verifies the existence of aliens visiting Earth because it places Mercury's perihelion (closest approach to the Sun) at the X (white) location in Figure 5. Table 4 illustrates the planets position assuming this alignment. The date, 25 February 2007 (the appearance of the comet swarm threat) - implied by the planetary alignment - is authenticated by Pr(CR105, IRAS). 'Cometary Showers' states that 'Your government already knows they're coming close again' in early/94.
|Measured**||163.0o +/- 10o||51.0o +/- 17o||276.0o+/-12o||Not On T367||103.0o||139o||161.5o||195.0o|
Extra-terrestrials would be keenly aware of Vulcan as they could use it to adjust their spaceships' trajectory when entering or exiting our solar system. This, combined with the localization of a comet swarm headed toward the inner solar system by their postulated debris detecting LIDAR would permit precise knowledge of when Earth would be at risk of a future impact. Human history has several cases (often biblical) where aliens have warned mankind of impending impacts and even where action has been undertaken to save us. In fact, the term 'angels' may have been used for 'aliens' in ancient writings.
Figure 5 appears to be an excellent example of just such a current alien warning occurring again. Crop circle T367 indicates a warning of an impending impact event. Pr(CR105, IRAS) indicates that this warning is likely valid. The planets are disproportionately large but the orbits are to scale. The "small white spots" (four objects, one broken in two) called 'grapeshot' are depictions of meteors or comets. The "missing" Earth (while its orbit is still shown) signifies its devastation by the anticipated comet impacts. The precise locations of the planets and their orbit's perihelia define the date/position of the comet swarm's appearance to within a few days.
The greatest implication of CR105's discovery is that it clarifies some of the links between science and religion. Specifically, either Pr(CR105,NO IRAS) or Pr(CR105,IRAS) supports the concepts that:
1. THE ASTRAL PLANE
The scientific community is beginning to recognize the existence of the Astral Plane. Of course, they do not call it that, but rather the 'noosphere'. For example, what "Princeton's Global Consciousness Project (GPC) is beginning to realize is the following:
One is the history of research on consciousness and the development of measures that seem to capture direct effects of intention and group states of mind in an objective, scientific medium. Over the last few decades, technologically and scientifically sophisticated experimental work has produced incontrovertible evidence for effects of consciousness on physical systems, and evidence for anomalous interpersonal communication and acquisition of information about distant events. This research indicates a subtle but pervasive, nonlocal interconnection that is manifested by mind and consciousness, and the findings seem consonant with the second thread, namely, ideas like those expressed so beautifully by Teilhard de Chardin on humanity's purpose. He argued that we were to be the source and substance of a noosphere, a layer of intelligence for the Earth.Philosophically, the metaphysical community has discussed this as the 'Astral Plane' for years.
2. ASTROLOGY'S VALIDITY
Astrological data from the time of manifestation of the Christ and Buddha Infinite Soul Avatars as well as the Dawn Of Mankind was used to compute Vulcan's period. A comet in a 3:2 resonate orbit about Vulcan has a period two thirds that of Vulcan. So the degree that the measured period of comet CR105's relates to the theoretical resonate comet period computed from Vulcan's theoretical period [either Pr(CR105,NO IRAS) or Pr(CR105,IRAS)] is the measure of the degree that astrology is a valid science.
Further, this analysis shows that the 'Astral radiation' emanating from planets nucleating around Schwarzschild singularities (or black holes) can influences human (and likely animal) behavior via a psi-like wave (as in the dependent variable in the Schrodinger Equation) that changes the randomness of common physical events.The mechanism for the link between Black Holes and Personality has already been analyzed. There already is an extensive theory, ASTRO-METRICS, that develops the theory of how planets form around Primordial Black Holes (PBHs) and applies it to the generation of solar systems about other stars. This theory depicts not only how planets are formed, but their satellites, their rings and even 'asteroid' belts.
The purpose of this work is to demonstrate how an old theosophical concept can be amended to form a new cosmological theory. That theory, called ASTRO-METRICS, shows how primordial black holes seed or initiate nucleation of stellar systems. This new theory postulates that seeds for planets and planetary satellites were the result of simple tidal interaction between two primordial black holes co- orbiting each other at the time of the Big Bang. Detonation of these primordial black holes produces enormous explosions, large enough to shatter a small planet or satellite. The quantitative results derived from this model resolve many existing astronomical enigmas.Astrology was used by the Russian army and likely is a tool of other military/diplomatic corps.
Before the new year of Jan. 1, a group of astrologers gathered at a news conference professing their optimism for Russia in the year ahead. Their Putinesque predictions were that the "worst times have gone" and that a beneficial 12 months lies ahead because it would be "a year of the realization of decisions already taken," Interfax reported. Much depends -- according to Sergei Bezborodny, head of the astrology center at the Central House of the Russian Army -- on the period from Jan. 26-28 when oil prices will sink to a critical level. If Russia survives those days, then things will be fine.
3. CHRIST, BUDDHA AND THE DAWN OF MANKIND
Christ and Buddha (and likely Lao Tzu and Sri Krishna) are similar beings. They are denoted by the term 'Infinite Soul Avatars' because they form with the aid of Vulcan, which is also necessary to stimulate the development of a sentient species (mankind in this case). The probability, Pr(CR105,NO IRAS), is a measure of the likelihood of this association because the manifestation times of the Infinite Soul Avatars as well as the manifestation (Dawn Of) Mankind was used to compute the theoretical orbital period of Vulcan (and therefore the orbital period of comets existing in a 3:2 orbital resonance with Vulcan's period. Note the recognition of these Infinite Soul Avatars by the Oversoul.
Astrological considerations are employed to define the location of Vulcan when an avatar of the infinite soul manifests in a human body. Only the relative positions of the Sun and Vulcan "color" the personality of an Infinite soul avatar as it is perceived on Earth. For both Christ and Buddha, it is "unfortunate" to have to visit the physical plane. . . From an astrological perspective, this forces both Christ and Buddha to have one astrological aspect in common, and it is an opposite. Squares are not permitted because the Infinite soul is configured to incarnate on the astral Sun. The Earth (and a physical human) "gets in the way" when an Infinite soul avatar manifests. This position specifies Vulcan's right ascension. The nominal configuration of the Sun and Vulcan has already been established for the Christ E point. Vulcan was found to be approximately directly opposite the Sun in both declination and right ascension. Vulcan must be opposite the Sun at the Buddha C point as well, but the declination of Buddha C point is free to be any value consistent with a co- planar orbit.However, there are subtle differences in the astrological aspects of the Christ and Buddha avatars:
Since Vulcan is thought to be within 1o (4 minutes) of this position, the 25* or 26* December orbits would most likely apply. Nevertheless, the 25* December orbit - C"(0)E(0)V is preferred because that date is the one most consistent with the full Moon legend, the Chinese (11/14) astrological data as well as the western astrological DOM data. Note: Buddha most likely manifested 25 December 413 BC - Christmas day.
Buddha has a normal "parallel" aspect in declination and Christ has a "contra- parallel" aspect in declination. Astrological aspects color important perspectives of the manifestation of the Christ and Buddha avatars. Some astrological sources treat contra-parallels like opposites implying that they, too, are unfortunate for the individual involved. In the case of Buddha, a normal "parallel" is involved because both the Sun and Vulcan are at the same negative (southern) declination. A normal parallel is considered favorable and treated much like a conjunction. Parallels form intense influences on the individual involved, and this should be true for the manifest Infinite soul as well. It is interesting to notice that Buddha was honored and respected in his own land, even to the point that a country, Bhutan, is named after him. Even his human counterpart was born of royalty. Christ, on the other hand, was and still is reviled and denigrated by the country of his birth (Israel) even until this day. . . . It seems like the "contra-parallel" intensely worked against Christ in the land into which He was born whereas the normal "parallel" intensely worked for Buddha in the land into which he was born. This astrological affliction foretold Christ's brutal treatment.Sentient Galactic Life requires the galactic center, two nearby stars and several planets/satellites.
Large binaries star systems often produce two almost independent solar systems as if "God" foresaw the need for different planets to host different EILFs (Ensouled Intelligent life Forms), yet be close enough to encourage interaction. Other binary systems (often with dark stars) offer only one habitable planet. There, EILFs are close enough to interact with another, even if only modest technology is available. The two stars provide the mechanisms needed to form the required Avatars. The Avatars require two stars to implement the development of their personalities as they incarnate in host bodies.Pr(CR105,NO IRAS) validates the concept that the astral radiation from the two stars and the galactic center influence the Characteristics or 'birth' of a sentient species just like astral radiation influences the same in a human being.
The galactic center is the source of the "Rising Sign" influence on humans at birth and it is likewise linked to the birth of an EILF. . . . As planets bearing living creatures intersect the spin plane of the galactic black hole, a spiritual "jolt" is delivered to free them from the group soul or to initiate ensoulment of a selected life form.
Astral radiation from the galactic black hole is necessary to form EILFs on a given planet, but the Primordial Black Hole at the center of the planet interacts with that radiation with radiation of its own. Additionally, the star at the center of the solar system provides astral radiation of its own. However, in multi-star (e.g. binary star) systems, the astral radiation from another star in the system can contribute astral radiation to develop the sentient species, and certainly to Avatars of the sentient species that inhabits that star system. The result is that the structure of sentient life form might be rather unique to a given planet, or certainly to a given solar system.It also validates the concept that Infinite Avatars, are similar to an entire sentient species. For example, they are like all of mankind combined into one sentient being (It remains unproven that these avatars are equal to combined individual souls of seven sentient species.) Infinite Soul Avatars are like the combined group or gang of all ensouled humans that ever have or ever will exist.
The Dawn Of Mankind (DOM) occurred when mankind changed from an animal species (governed by an exterior soul) to an EILF with beings having an internal soul. The transition from group to individual soul came in the spring because there had to be a smooth transition between man (the animal) and man (the ensouled creature of reason). Thereafter, men were born with an indwelling soul. The formation of a sentient species is somewhat the same as the formation of an Avatar (such as the Infinite Soul which is the "Essence Twin" to all humanity). . . . This arrangement must be aligned with the galactic center because this is the source of the "astral radiation" that permits the fragment of the animal's group spirit to be inserted into the organism at birth. The personality of each one of us is most strongly influenced by the "Rising Sign" in western astrology or the "birth hour" in various forms of Chinese astrology. This parameter basically involves the angle from the galactic center each one of us assumes at our time birth. . . .
4. RELIGION'S WOEFUL INFLUENCE ON HUMANITY
Vulcan is a 'spiritual' planet. It is associated with avatars like Christ and Buddha as well as the formation of mankind, a sentient (ensouled) species. The probability, Pr(CR105,NO IRAS), is a measure of the likelihood of this association. Astrological aspects assumed by Vulcan with respect to the Sun and the Galactic Center at the birth of a sentient species on Earth flavor its existence.
Should the Sun, Vulcan and the galactic center be at some astrological aspect to one another at the DOM, it can influence the entire tenor of mankind. Squares (90o) and opposites (180o) are unfavorable aspects (afflictions) manifesting fears in our collective EILF (or group mind). Trines (120o), sextiles (60o) and conjunctions (0o) are favorable aspects. A Vulcan well aspected to the galactic center brings benefits. Vulcan parallel the galactic center (and the Sun at the first point of Aires) is like a favorable aspect (a conjunction), and offers us (a warrior species operating out of the action polarity) an intense zest for life (fighting, exploring and emphasized sexuality). . . . But Vulcan square or opposite the galactic center at the Dawn Of Mankind (DOM) can be anticipated because we cling to the negative pole of spiritualism, faith (its positive pole is "verification"). Our spiritualism is engaged with intensity as well. This affliction attacks mankind's action oriented polarity generating our most popular Chief Feature, Stubbornness (a fear of change). . . . Vulcan, and its association with avatars, generates religion. Thus, we vigorously adhere to unverified spiritual assumptions (assumed to be true based on faith) and take action (go to war) to support religious causes.The value of, Pr(CR105,NO IRAS), indicates the likelihood that Vulcan forms a simple astrological square with the galactic center at the birth of the human species, exerting a NEGATIVE influence on all of humanity from the time of its formation. Mankind is an Ensouled Intelligent Life Form (EILF), specifically it is a Warrior EILF (Thus there will be wars and rumors of wars):
Their loyalty extends to races and nationalities, and encourages racism or nationalism. Their loyalty extends beyond racial or national boundaries and includes various cliques, sects or religions. They are both loyal to their own institutions as they are loyal to opposing others of different institutions. This loyalty encourages faith rather than test and verification. Fortunately for other EILFs in the galaxy, this loyalty (stubbornness) acts as a brake on their technological prowess. Without it, they would run rampant throughout the galaxy.Thus, our religions, loyalties, racial identities are turned against ourselves. For example, we love our avatars and turn their teachings into 'religion' which we then use to 'war' against another 'religion'. Much the same can be said for any other group like a specific 'racial identity' or 'gang'. This is the 'curse' that all of mankind must overcome through knowledge, logic and love.
5. VERIFICATION OF FUTURE MANIFESTATIONS OF THE INFINITE SOUL
The Chinese Tzu Wei astrology suggests a patterned formation of Infinite Soul Avatars and this MAY offer a way to verify (to some degree) future manifestations of these Avatars. The value of either, Pr(CR105,NO IRAS) or Pr(CR105,IRAS) indicates that one criterion of an Infinite Soul Avatar may be:
The Tzu Wei principal star 104 is always present on the chart, but not necessarily in the personality of the subject. It must be associated with the personality house for an infinite soul avatar because they always manifest in the bodies of human beings that have had king soul personality types occupy them.Astrology like this was used to isolate the baby Jesus from the other children in Bethlehem.
Pr(CR105,NO IRAS) alone suggests that Christ and Buddha could heal humans because they were similar to an entire sentient species. It is suggested that this can happen because they are like the Essence Twin to all humanity. The healing process occurs because 'fear' is subdued in the human encountering its Essence Twin (or Infinite Soul Avatar). When fear departs, the being recovers.
The Infinite soul can be thought of as the "Essence Twin" to every human being alive at the time of the manifestation, and as such, it has a profound influence on our culture. It is remembered and revered by major segments of the world's population. Since it manifests in a human body, that human's body type is identical with its at the time of manifestation. These manifestation times can be employed to determine Vulcan's ephemeredes. . . . Additionally, the tenor of mankind's collective group mind may be defined by astrological aspects computed from the relative locations of Vulcan, the galactic center and the Vernal equinox at the Dawn Of Mankind (the beginning of sentient Homo Sapiens). This verifies the precision of Vulcan orbital parameters and precisely defines the time of the Dawn Of Mankind.Thus the ability to heal humans by the mere exposure to their personalities is another condition that an incarnate Infinite Soul Avatar should meet. This curing process can be accomplished individual humans (i. e. in the absence of an Infinite Soul Avatar) by Essence Contact and this is easiest done by Essence Twins. (This may be the subject of a future paper).
Pr(CR105,NO IRAS) and Pr(CR105,IRAS) imply that a third condition occurs. Upon examining the manifestation of the Buddha and Christ Infinite Soul Avatars, an alignment between the Sun and Vulcan is necessary when avatars transition from being 'human' to being 'divine'.
Bailey (interpreting Blavatsky's theosophy - which is steeped in astrology) states that "Vulcan controls the anvil-like process of time and ... is forging the way for the coming avatar". Or, "Vulcan brings in what might be called the endurance like aspect of the will-to-be which carries the incarnated Son of God through the experiences of the dark time...".This is the foundation principle by which the orbit of our Sun's brown dwarf companion star was computed. We call this companion star Vulcan because Madam Blavatsky called in Vulcan.
Vulcan forming avatars acts like the Moon when it forms the ensouled human being on the Earth. For those unfamiliar with this relationship, the Moon, (which is the agent of fertilization) projects its astral ray at the time of conception through the same right ascension (or its opposite) which later corresponds to the Rising Sign at the time of birth. The Vulcan/Sun alignment is analogous to the Moon/Earth alignment, except that the Earth must be in between them.
There are also some minor conditions not considered here. Since this century may be fraught with dangers incurred during comet swarms passing through the inner solar system, the manifestation of the Infinite Soul Avatar could be useful, if not necessary, in saving mankind from annihilation.
Giant comet 2000 CR105's orbital period offers a simple and uncluttered way to verify Vulcan's orbital period because it employs simple astronomical measurements rather than arguable geo-climatological data. When Vulcan is included in the solar system, CR105's average period (over three orbital periods - 9938 years) changed from 3316.7 years to 3319.3 +/- 19.5 years. If future observations do not generate dramatic changes, it is highly probable (77% - 83%) that CR105's period is very close to the predicted 3:2 resonance (3312.7 years) with Vulcan's theoretical period (4969 years). Two other Kuiper Belt objects may also be in similar resonate orbits. Moreover, it is likely that other such objects fragmented when rounding the Sun in grazing orbits producing predictable comet swarms.
CR105, being in a resonate orbit with Vulcan, means more than it is just likely that Vulcan exists. It means the way Vulcan's orbit was computed is also valid. This generates profound ramifications.