Data is presented that indicates a Jovian sized planet exists in our outer solar system. This data includes an ancient Akkadian seal, recent Doppler shifts on Pioneer transmissions, IRAS data and the recent discovery of two dwarf planets in our outer solar system along with other similar objects. Tragically, there seems to have been a deliberate effort, suspected to have its roots in political entities, to cover up, refute or even secret these observations.
None of these astronomically bodies directly threaten Earth. However, the Jovian sized body does generate comet swarms that reach into the inner solar system. When they pass by, impacting fragments usually caused catastrophic events like Noah's Flood or the Atlantis catastrophe. Furthermore, they induce major weather changes like the Younger Dryas (Ice Age) and the start of the Bølling interstadial (warm period) just as the late Royal Astronomer, Sir Fred Hoyle, predicted.
The astronomical model employed offers an estimation of the time and type of natural disaster Earth may soon be facing (as alluded to by departing DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano). An impact event like the one initiating the Younger Dryas Ice Age is anticipated.
There is a 4300 year old Akkadian seal that depicts a giant Jovian like planet in our outer solar system. A plot of the diameter of the Sun and the known Jovian planets on this seal verses their known mass generates a straight line, proving ancient knowledge of mass of these astronomical bodies.
The diameter of Jupiter and Saturn as they appear on the Akkadian seal can be measured directly and 4.9 mm and 4.4 mm respectively was obtained. The average between the two is 4.65 mm, which is exactly the value (4.65 mm) measured for the diameter of the unknown Jovian like planet on the Akkadian seal that we call Vulcan. This suggests that the diameter of this unknown object depicted in Figure 1 should be about the average between the diameters of Jupiter ( 86,881 miles) and Saturn (74,500 miles), or 80,691 miles.
Harrington, who worked at the United States Naval Observatory (USNO), became a believer in the existence of a Planet X beyond Pluto and undertook searches for it, with positive results coming from the IRAD (IRAS?) probe in 1983. Harrington collaborated initially with T. C. (Tom) Van Flandern
A well circulated, but unpublished, UFO case occurred on 6 October 1974. This was one that had the type of information that could spark the imagination of people at Cal Tech's Jet Propulsion Laboratories or the Palomar Observatory. For example, it had data explaining why those ET Alien Saucers could fly so fast. It also contained information about our own solar system, and the astronomical data collected revealed that our knowledge about our own solar system was incomplete.
The individual (a teenager) was invited to board an alien saucer and shown around. He was shown data about our own solar system from a device that we might now call a memory chip or thumb drive. He seemed to know a little of astronomical symbols. He was not mesmerized and remained lucid during the experience. However, more importantly, he prepared a report afterwards. Included was an example of the alien's interpretation of our alphabet (corrections were offered) and a description of our own solar system from the ET aliens perspective. Both are presented in Figure 3. Figure 4 shows their interpretation of our astrological planet symbols. Note in Figure 3 that common planetary symbols were employed by the aliens to describe the planets, as if they had access to our literature or television. The astrological P like symbol for Pluto is also correct. The first three alien symbols (12 V) translates to G2V when our alphabet is properly used. The Sun's astronomical characterization is that of a G2 spectral class main sequence (V) star.
Notice that three other objects are indicated, one above and one below the string of planets and a final one at the end. Two (* and φ) new planets seem to be present, with the latter out of the plane of the ecliptic. The I symbol denotes a super-giant star, which is clearly not present in our solar system or it would have been noted years ago. However, if the Invitee failed to notice a V (i.e. VI), this symbol would denote the logical extension of "sequences" to sub-dwarf type stars (e.g. a Protostar). The Invitee was told that the asteroids (Maldek) resulted from an exploded planet, a view popularized by the late Naval Observatory astronomer, Tom Van Flandern.
In 1999, the above astronomical bodies awaited discovery. However, two of them seem to have been discovered in the decade between 2003 and 2013. Planet Eris is about the size of Pluto and it has its own moon, Dysnomia. Its orbital inclination is about 44o. Its high orbital inclination suggests that perhaps Eris is φ as depicted in Figure 3.
The mass of 2012 VP113, the most recently found distant planet orbiting the solar system, is yet to be found, but to qualify as a dwarf planet, it must be massive enough to be formed into a somewhat spherical shape as the other known planets.
However, what about the star-like object (I or VI) that was revealed by the Invitee? Well, he is not the only UFO researcher to postulate a massive star-like body like this. Dr. J. Allen Hynek, Astronomer and civilian scientific consultant to the U.S. Air Force said the same thing and published it in the November, 1982 issue of Science Digest.
The Pioneer 10 and Pioneer 11 spacecraft were the first in the series to be designed for exploring the outer solar system. Perhaps these missions were designed to sense the gravitational tug from this massive body in order to verify its presence as Dr. Hynek revealed.
It would not take much of an astronomer to realize that if there is a brown dwarf like star in our solar system, it probably is not going to be in a circular orbit like most of the other solar planets. Rather, an elliptical one would be anticipated. Furthermore, if it is elliptical enough, it can draw Kuiper Belt objects into the inner solar system and if they became Sun grazing comets, they could break up and form comet swarms.
Not all these comet fragment from these 'break ups' would hit Earth, but if the swarm got big enough, a few could. Then,nasty things would happen like: Noah's Great Flood or the Atlantis catastrophe. Furthermore, if they found evidence of such an object, they would certainly warn those paragons of virtue among us, our politicians.
The search for Vulcan revealed its orbital parameters albeit that they were determined in an unusual manner. It was noticed that the orbit produced described a solar body that was in a stable region of our solar system relative to passing stars. However, it was also noticed that the orbital inclination was over specified and generated by two completely different sets of data. Vulcan's Orbital Parameters
Vulcan's Aphelion is at 41.6 billion miles (448 AU). Stars pass within 2000 AU from the Sun over the solar system's lifetime and they would eject planets more distant than Hynek's 50 billion miles (537.6 AU).Notice that two of the vectors determining Vulcan's orbital plane were deduced using Blavatsky's theosophy and an exotic form of the Chinese Tzu Wei astrology. These defined Vulcan's location in 413 BC and 33 AD. A third vector is defined by the IRAS point 1732+239 and defined Vulcan's 1983 location. These three vectors are directly associated with Vulcan and not indirectly to it as some small Kuiper belt objects do.The Probability (P) of these three vectors fortuitously falling in the same orbit plane inclination with such a tiny angular uncertainty as Vulcan's is about one chance in 250 [P = 0.6%]. Put another way, there are about 249 chances out of 250 [P = 99.6%] that the body described in Table 2 is Blavatsky's 'Vulcan'. Vulcan existence was either missed or suppressed with the NEWS media releases suggesting the latter (Mystery Heavenly Body Perhaps As Big As Jupiter - O'Toole). The probability of IRAS point 1732+239 fortuitously lying in Vulcan's orbit plane to within +/- 0.23o (~two sigma) is:
(0.46 deg x 360 deg)/( 12.57 X 3282.8 sq. deg. in a sphere) = 165.6 sq. deg./41264.8 sq. deg. = 0.004The question of it either being accidently missed or purposely suppressed raises the question of deceit being employed to give our elite an advantage over the general public should a threatening comet swarm be approaching.
Politicians have been the bane of man's existence. 2000 years ago, our Governors sought to kill Jesus and eventually killed Him. September 2013, our Senators sought to extend the nuclear war in Syria to the USA's Charleston Harbor via a one kiloton B61-11 nuclear bomb taken from Dryas AFB, TX without a paper trail. Our elected officials along with their appointed corrupt-o-crats make our world unsafe everywhere. Seek elements of deceit and treachery in an important issue, and these people, the worst among us, are not far away.
Seeking funding and resources, the astronomers told our political leaders about the possibility of a massive object in the outer solar system being the source of major natural cosmic catastrophes here on Earth. That immediately got their attention.
"You don’t ever want a crisis to go to waste; it’s an opportunity to do important things that you would otherwise avoid."However, later, too much later, they realized genocide was what those who lead us had in mind. One can be sure that those important things will not be done for the benefit of those our politicians' claim to represent, but rather for the elite who they really serve. Politicians are skilled at 'controlling the masses' through lies and deceit, but they are unskilled in scientific matters. Thus, seek the illogical items in scientific reports, for they are the fruits of the politician's interventions. Here are three examples of such illogic likely stemming from political control:
Analysis of the radio tracking data from the Pioneer 10 and 11 spacecraft at distances between 20–70 A.U.from the Sun has consistently indicated the presence of a small but anomalous Doppler frequency drift.
The following was the explanation offered more than a decade after the Pioneer 11 radio transmitter 'unexpectedly' failed:
Mystery force tugs distant probes - 15 May, 2001
The puzzle is that Pioneer 10 is slowing more quickly than it should.
It was initially suggested that this might be due to the force from a tiny gas leak or that it was being pulled off course by the gravity of an unseen Solar System object.
The mystery deepened further when an analysis of the trajectory being followed by its sister spacecraft, Pioneer 11, launched in 1973, showed that it too was being subjected to the same mysterious effect.
But Pioneer 11 is on the opposite side of the Solar System from Pioneer 10, about 22 billion km (about 14 billion miles) away. This means the effect cannot be the gravitational effect of some unseen body.
But others have dismissed this as being too fanciful, arguing that if the Pioneer anomaly was really indicative of a change in our understanding of gravity, then it would be apparent in the orbits of the planets around the Sun - which it is not.
The Deceitful Politically Correct Explanation For Item 1:
Note that more than a decade earlier, Pioneer 11's radio transmitter 'failed' in 1990 when it was about the distance of Pluto's perigee (30 AU) and now Pioneer 10 is beyond the distance of Pluto's aphelion (50 AU). Amateur astronomers could monitor the unencrypted Pioneer's radio signals and measure the Doppler. If there were a Jovian sized planet close to one of the Pioneer spacecraft, and if attempts were being made to 'secret it', it would be best that this spacecraft would not be transmitting a signal because amateurs and foreign analysts could also detect its presence.
The Problem with Gravity: New Mission Would Probe Strange Puzzle - October
Which leaves open staggering possibilities that would
force wholesale reprinting of all physics books:
Summarizing Item 1's Deceit:
Obviously, Space.com did not think too much of this 'Physics Is Wrong' explanation. The explanation of the Doppler shift offered above is an example of a non-technological nonsense explanation of a scientific issue. The Pioneer 11 radio transmission failure seems just too convenient, and a if a 'Radio Turn Off' occurred, it would suggest that the Jovian sized planet was on the Pioneer 11 side of our solar system.
Figure 7 shows a 1983 NEWS report of a heavenly body almost as large as Jupiter, or possibly a protostar (brown dwarf) discovered 50 billion miles away.
The Deceitful Politically Correct Explanation For Item 2:
Don't Blame 'Planet Nine' for Earth's Mass Extinctions But Planet Nine - a newly proposed but not yet confirmed world perhaps 10 times more massive than Earth that's thought to orbit far beyond Pluto - probably could not have triggered such "death from the skies" events, researchers said.Catastrophic weather changes on Earth caused by comet or large meteorite collisions are used to verify Vulcan's orbital period. See:
"I suspect it has something like zero effect on us," said Mike Brown of the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) in Pasadena
Many people, including Mr. Hazlewood, claim that NASA actually sighted Planet X in 1983, and it was reported in the Washington Post! The article claims that two scientists named Neugebauer and Houck used the Infrared Astronomy Satellite (called IRAS) and found a Jupiter-sized object a few billion kilometers out from the Sun.Some of the points in the Washington Post article are not considered:
This turns out not to be the case. Rather than rely on the accuracy of a newspaper article (and you can find out how accurate those are elsewhere on this site) I did something that never occurred to the doomsayers: I sent an email to the two astronomers asking what happened back in '83. Gerry Neugebauer replied, and told me the real poop.
Guess which it turned out to be? Sure enough, much deeper images were taken, and some of the objects were found to be dense gas clouds in our own Galaxy, while others turned out to be very distant galaxies
So IRAS did not see Nibiru, Planet X, or anything of the sort, despite the claims of the doomcriers.
They have not only calculated its approximate distance, but have some evidence to speculate that it is on the inbound leg of its orbit about the Sun. The distance of unknown IRAS objects was determined by parallax measurements. How could they estimate its approximate distance unless some parallax measurements were obtained? They could speculate that it was 50 billion miles away because that is about as far as a planet like object can get without being eventually scattered away from our solar system by a passing star. However, in this case, they even have evidence that leads them to speculate that it is on the inbound leg of its orbit.
Neugebauer is truth fully saying that it is not coming through our inner solar system for if it was, and if it was Jupiter size, it would scatter the known inner planets away from the Sun. There were thousands of IRAS objects found, this was just one of the first nine and why would this one be so perplexing? Why would they "hope" the mystery body is a distant galaxy? Finding a major new Jovian planet in our outer solar system would be a great discovery for any astronomer!
The first nine unresolved objects found by the IRAS Satellite have all been dismissed just as Neugebauer and Houck "hoped". They had found what they were looking for right away because they were 'pre-targeted' by the Pioneer and Voyager data. These statements about this IRAS find were 'Politically Correct'. Now there was proof of Sitchin's Jovian sized body in the outer solar system that generates comet swarms causing massive natural catastrophes on Earth. Catastrophes that politicians could use as a weapon to destroy their enemies (like Russia that would naturally be turned into a polar desert during a new Ice Age).
The Jupiter sized object was not the one near Orion, but rather the one called Vulcan (IRAS 1732+239) on this web site and their own published results show:
1732+239 showed multiple objects in the error box and had a heliocentric declination 47o above the ecliptic plane.Should some of those multiple objects be satellites or moons of this object, and should they even get a hint of their motion over a six month period, an estimate of this object's mass could be made. Moreover, reflecting back to Item 1, notice how the Voyager probes (launched 1977) bracket this IRAS 1732+239 object's location and that the Pioneer 11 spacecraft (launched 1972 - 73) was headed in the general direction of this anticipated Jovian planet or brown dwarf star (IRAS 1732+239). This supports the thesis that the Pioneer 11 radio signal was silenced to prevent other analysts from realizing that there was a massive object in the outer solar system. See Table 1.
|PROBE/TARGET||RT. ASC.||DEC.||RANGE||HELIO. LONG.||HELIO. DEC.|
|Pioneer 10||5.057 hrs||25.83 deg||89 AU||77.20 deg||3.01 deg|
|Pioneer 11||18.596 hrs||-8.57 deg||70 AU||279.06 deg||14.59 deg|
|Voyager 1||17.076 hrs||12.13 deg||97 AU||253.35 deg||34.78 deg|
|IRAS 1732+239||17.5476 hrs||23.9433 deg||448** AU||260.78 deg||47.17 deg|
|Voyager 2||19.680 hrs||-52.26 deg||78 AU||287.50 deg||-30.35 deg|
A Planet X going through our inner solar system is highly unlikely, but a comet
swarm (with associated fragments impacting Earth) is far more realistic. Given
this observation, the reasonable assessment by John Maynard of the resulting
global devastation follows:
2014 Planet X Watch Trends - 10-December-2013
NASA Employee Speaks about Nibiru Aka Planet X - March 29, 2012
A significant highlight of that search was the announcement in December 1983 by NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory that IRAS (the infra-red telescope) has found a planet, much larger than Earth, moving in the distant heavens in our direction. The announcement – hastily retracted as a "misunderstanding" – prompted the Reagan-Gorbachov meetings
Two of the vectors determining Vulcan's orbital plane were deduced using Blavatsky's theosophy. The third vector is defined by the IRAS point 1732+239. The chances of these three vectors fortuitously falling in the same orbit plane to +/-0.23 degrees two sigma uncertainty is about one chance in 250. Thus, there are 249 chances out of 250 that IRAS 1732+239 is Vulcan. This strongly suggests that our 'Vulcan' is the IRAS 1732+239 point and was the cause of the NEWS media releases and is Planet Nine.
It is highly unlikely that all the physics books have to be rewritten due to a change in the laws of gravity. The Pioneer 11's radio transmitter 'failed' in 1990 at a 'convenient time' if attempts were being made to secret the Doppler effects on its unencrypted analogue radio signal. Pioneer 11's radio transmitter 'failure' was even more convenient because it was headed towards the general heliocentric longitude of IRAS 1732+239 AKA Vulcan, or the Dark star. The Voyagers radio signals were encrypted so they could not be read by amateur astronomers or foreign intelligence analysts.
It appears that both the Pioneer and Voyager space probes were both used to find a Jovian sized planet or an ultra tiny brown dwarf star (the Dead Star) orbiting our Sun. By 1977, it appeared to be localized between 253o and 288o heliocentric longitude. The Pioneers were virtually in the ecliptic plane. It is possible that the Voyagers were launched to define this object's heliocentric declination and mass, possibly based on the 6 October 1974 UFO contact case.
The Deceitful Politically Correct Explanation For Item 3:
Keep Eris' existence a secret!
Explaining the origin of the orbits of 2000 CR105 (a = 230 AU, q = 44 AU) and 2003 VB12 (a = 531 AU, q = 74 AU, unofficially known as Sedna) is a major test for our understanding of the primordial evolution of the outer solar system. Gladman et al. have shown that 2000 CR105 could not have been a normal member of the scattered disk that had its perihelion distance increased by chaotic diffusion. The same conclusion also clearly applies to 2003 VB12. In this paper, we explore five seemingly promising mechanisms to explain the origin of the orbits of these peculiar objects: (1) the passage of Neptune through a high-eccentricity phase, (2) the past existence of massive planetary embryos in the Kuiper belt or the scattered disk, (3) the presence of a massive trans-Neptunian disk at early epochs that perturbed highly inclined scattered-disk objects, (4) encounters with other stars that perturbed the orbits of some of the solar system's trans-Neptunian planetesimals, and (5) the capture of extrasolar planetesimals from low-mass stars or brown dwarfs encountering the Sun. Of all these mechanisms, the ones giving the most satisfactory results are those related to the passage of stars (4 and 5).
Kenyon and Bromley believe Sedna was probably not captured itself, but its orbit was sufficiently disturbed to serve as evidence of the stellar near-miss. The two consider a Kuiper Belt Object called 2000 CR105 as the best candidate for a captured object, due to its highly elliptical and inclined orbit. But they say that only the detection of objects with orbits inclined 40 degrees or more from the plane of the ecliptic will prove the existence of 'alien' planetoids.
But they say that only the detection of objects with orbits inclined 40 degrees or more from the plane of the ecliptic will prove the existence of 'alien' planetoids.
The Nature reference is Scott J. Kenyon and Benjamin C. Bromley, "Stellar encounters as the origin of distant Solar System objects in highly eccentric orbits," Nature 432, pp. 598 – 602 (02 December 2004).
Table 2 gives the orbital parameters of the new dwarf planet and some of its
related objects. Notice that Eris has an orbital inclination of about 44o. This is why its
existence was kept secret!
|Period (years)||4969.0||4175.54 (4300 b.c.)||435.54||11400||558.04||733||248.09|
|Asc. Node||189.0o||90.818o||252.39o||144.546o||35 .9531o||211.761o||110.303 o|
Even Cal Tech's Mike Brown told us directly that he would continue to keep it a secret if he knew.
Where Are You Hiding Planet X, Dr. Brown? - 11/04/2009
Astronomers are already postulating that these (*) objects are captured extrasolar planetesimals from low-mass stars or brown dwarfs encountering the Sun or the past existence of massive planetary embryos in the Kuiper belt. In other words, the orbital characteristics of these small planetoids associates them with a more massive object, i. e. Vulcan. Kenyon and Bromley say that only the detection of objects with orbits inclined 40o or more from the plane of the ecliptic will prove the existence of 'alien' planetoids (**) like Eris. This likely was why the existence of (2003 UB313) Eris was kept secret. Making matters even worse, the orbit of CR105 makes it the best candidate for a captured object and it exists in a 3:2 orbital resonance with Vulcan's orbital period. Not only is CR105 a captured object (from a low mass stellar-like object), its even in a resonate orbit with Vulcan cementing their association!
So why would astronomers hide a distant planet or brown dwarf star that would never come near our Earth? Most wouldn't, but our politicians would. Those comet swarms it generates, as illustrated in Figure 6, can change the Earths' weather no matter where their accompanying fragments hit. Catastrophic weather changes can be used as a weapon if it is known when they are going to occur!
Here are some highlights of the recently found dwarf planet nicknamed after current vice president and former senator, Joe Biden.
Figure 8. New View Of The Outer Solar System
A surprise monster may be lurking in our solar system. A newly discovered dwarf planet has grabbed the crown as the most distant known object in our solar system – and its orbit hints at a giant, unseen rocky world, 10 times the mass of Earth and orbiting far beyond Pluto.
NASA's Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) scoured this region of space in 2010 and 2011 searching for a so-called Planet X and came up empty.
However, WISE was looking for the tell-tale warmth of gas giants – a rocky "super-Earth", like the one Sheppard's team suggest, would be too cold for the telescope to pick up. "This is too faint for WISE," says Ned Wright, the space telescope's principal investigator. Even if the planet has a small internal heat source – and absorbs some sunlight, it would still not generate enough heat to register, he adds.
Note A: Dwarf Planet Biden's (2012 VP113's) Aphelion = 438.11 A.U.
VULCAN'S Orbital Parameters From Blavetsky's Theosophy - " Vulcan's Aphelion is 41.6 billion miles (447.6 A.U.) vs. Hynek's 50 billion."
Note B: Vulcan's aphelion is 447.6 A.U. and perihelion is 134.8 A.U. away. The distance away from Vulcan (x) where the Sun will begin to capture a dwarf planet is:
x = perihelion/[1 + (MSun/MVulcan)0.5] = 2.7 A.U.
438.11 A.U. (VP113) - 447.6 A.U.(Vulcan) = 9.49 A.U.
Thus, VP113 is likely a dwarf planet of Vulcan captured by the Sun and there could still be remaining dwarf planets of Vulcan (which is associated with IRAS object 1732+239) still orbiting the Sun.
Note C: This suggest that it also was captured from Vulcan (Inclination 48.44o +3.12o/-9.05o) when Vulcan was at perihelion. The perihelion of Vulcan minus the perihelion of Eris is 134.8 - 97.65 = 37.15 A.U. Thus, Eris' original distance from Vulcan was 37.15 AU. Both Eris and Vulcan's inclination could have been moved a few degrees from the ideal 45o by a passing star.
Note D: The ratio of Biden's to Eris' distance from Vulcan before they were captured is 3.91. This is almost 22, further testifying to both these dwarf planets were originally planets of Vulcan.
- A Sedna-Like Body With A Perihelion Of 80 Astronomical Units - 27 March 2014
Here we report the presence of a second Sedna-like object, 2012 VP113, whose perihelion is 80 AU. The detection of 2012 VP113 confirms that Sedna is not an isolated object; instead, both bodies may be members of the inner Oort cloud, whose objects could outnumber all other dynamically stable populations in the Solar System.
- Discovery Of New Dwarf Planet Hints At Other Objects In Solar System - March 26, 2014
The scientists noticed something else that seemed too odd to be a coincidence: Both Sedna and 2012 VP113 seemed to be making their closest approach to the sun at similar angles. That could mean that there's a giant planet out there, tugging at both of their orbits in the same way. If so, this ghost planet could have a size of anywhere from 1 to 20 Earth masses, Sheppard said.
Future telescopes should be able to help settle whether a super-Earth exists by finding more dwarf planets like Sedna and 2012 VP113, scientists said.
- The Discovery Of A Dwarf Planet Leads To Speculation That Another Rogue Planet Exists Beyond It. - March 27, 2014
Orbital analysis of 2012 VP113, a tiny planetoid beyond Pluto, and other bodies indicates an undetected planet, a giant "super-earth," lurking on the outer edge of our solar system.
Figure 9. How 2012 VP113 And "Super Earth" Compare With Some Of Their NeighborsNote E: The diameters of Earth and super Earth are compared and range from two to ten Earth's diameter implying a diameter of 80,000 miles, vs. Sitchin's reported value of 80,691 miles. These values differ by only 0.86%
- Dwarf Planets In The Extreme Outer Solar System - March 26, 2014
Anomalies in the orbits of Sedna and 2012 VP113 tantalizingly suggest that one or more giant planets 10 times the mass of Earth could orbit in the dark, frozen outer fringe of our solar system, 250 A.U.s or more from the Sun.Note F: This 250 A.U. values is based on a nominal 4000 year period (2501.5 = 3953). The admitted period for VP113 goes up to 4590 years (2761.5 = 4585). Thus, the corresponding value for the postulated giant planet must be more than 276 A.U. The corresponding value for Vulcan is 291 A.U. (291.21.5 = 4969).
Biden (2012 VP113) aphelion plus its orbital distance from Vulcan is essentially equal to Vulcan's aphelion. The difference in their orbital inclination is simply due to the 'cranking' of this dwarf planet's orbit inclination up and down by Vulcan's massive gravitational forces as time passes. This is to be expected. Thus, Biden is clearly a planet of the brown dwarf star Vulcan that was captured by the Sun. Likewise, Eris was once a dwarf planet that of Vulcan. Note C shows that Eris has retained Vulcan's orbital inclination because it was captured when Vulcan was at perihelion. Note also that Note D shows the orbital distance of these two dwarf planets from Vulcan is not close to any of the original Astro-Metric Table 8-1 values predicted for these (then undiscovered) dwarf planets. Perhaps only Pluto and Eris really fit the definition of 'dwarf' planets and Pluto may be closer than normal to the ecliptic due to its presence near Neptune. Biden only tags along because it's possible distance from Vulcan when cast was about a fourth of Eris' distance. See Table 3 below and note the quality of the data 'fit':
|Planet Of Vulcan||Distance From Vulcan||Casting
Based On Astro-Metrics
|n||Predicted Aphelion From Sun|
|Pluto*||189.8 AU||1 th cast|
mid orbit casting*
|Postulated (2004 XR190)||74.3 AU||2 th cast||3||60.5 A.U.|
|Eris||37.15 A.U.||3 th cast||2||97.65 A.U.|
|Postulated (2015 RR245?)||18.6 AU||4 th cast||1||116.2 A.U. or 429 A.U.|
37.15/4 = 9.29 A.U.
|5 th cast||0||438.31 A.U.||
This assumes that the Sun's gravity 'cranked' Vulcan's dwarf planets orbit
planes into a direction oriented towards the Sun before transfer to solar
This (along with the Astro-Metric derived Bode Law - Table 8-2) seems to validate the Astro- Metric theory of Planet Formation. Note that Biden was captured while Vulcan was at aphelion. How can this be? The Astro-Metric theory is that many of the planetary orbits were formed when the universe was small and had just begun to grow. The dominate forces governing planetary motion changed abruptly from electro-static to gravitational while both Biden's and Vulcan's seeds were effectively at aphelion. The Sun's gravitational forces overpowered Vulcan's virtually instantaneously.
"ASTRO-METRICS proposes that formation of multiple star systems and their associated planets is the result of tidal interaction between primordial black holes (PBHs) formed during the Big Bang. Two principal PBHs attracted one another based on gravitational/electrostatic forces and quantum spin states, then co-orbited. Gravitational resonance, together with this co-orbital rotation, ejected smaller PBHs from these primary PBHs. The exact process is derived from a relativistic quantum mechanical theory beyond the scope of this web site. The ejected PBHs became seeds for the planets or satellites of our solar system. Growth to their current size occurred later in a two step process.Vulcan's more distant planets (that were formed first) were taken by the Sun when Vulcan was at perihelion. U. of Arizona astronomers postulate that a new planet exists with an orbit of about 60 AU. Its anticipated orbit's aphelion would be 134.8 AU - 74.3 AU = 60.5 AU. Note that 'distant' Pluto's predicted aphelion is a bit (6 A.U.) too large and that Vulcan's eccentricity has yet to be precisely verified. Nevertheless, the quality of these predictions do further suggest that Vulcan's orbital parameters may be valid and that Vulcan itself may have rings or satelites.
This theory proposes that the orbital radius of the ejected PBHs (formed on the atomic scale) expanded to macroscopic size as the universe rapidly expanded in its first few minutes. The periodic generation of the small planetary PBHs, formed by the co-orbiting stellar PBHs, is the basis of the Titus-Bode law. The heavy element core of the planets and the heavy element contribution to the stars pre-date the galaxies."
Once one can accept that we have a good estimate of Vulcan's period (4969 years theoretical vs. 4969.3 years measured), its influence on other Kuiper Belt objects becomes clear. Including Vulcan's mass and orbit in the solar system, CR105's period - averaged over two Vulcan periods - is 3307.6 years. Thus Vulcan's period is implied to be 4961.4 years from its 3:2 resonance with CR105's period. There are at least three other Vulcan related (Scatter Disc) objects which have yet to be analyzed in detail. Specifically, 2001 FP185 and 2002 GB332 appear to be in a similar 3:2 resonance with Vulcan. 1999 DP8 is in a resonance 4:1 and 2014 UZ224 in a 9:2 resonance with Vulcan. See Table 4.
|Period (yrs)||4969.0 +30/- 24||3313 (15) +/- 8 (18)||3305 (bc)||3079 +/- 14||3405.37||1135||1246|
|Ecc.||0.537 +0.09/-0.04||~ 1.0||0.80572||0.833||0.84867||0.651465||0.703|
|Inc.||48.44o +3o/- 9o||?||22.7o||14.17o||30.7572o||26.785o||38.4o|
|Asc. Node||189.0o +/- 1.3o||?||128.25o||176.99o||179.3004o||131.086o||323.0o|
|Arg. Of Peri||257.8o +6o/-13.5o||?||317.22o||36.90o||6.9787o||29.682o||13.9o|
|Aph. (AU)||448||444||411.62||387 +/- 1||418.44||179.64||196.768|
From the nickname of this dwarf planet (VP113 nicknamed Biden), we should be alerted to anticipate deceit. This deceit is in the estimated mass of the anticipated "Super Earth" lurking at the outer edge of our solar system. The astronomers say it is of 1 to 20 Earth masses, but the graphics (Figure 9) show a body of up to 80,000 miles in diameter - commensurate with the size of Sitchen's planet as depicted on the Akkadian seal. Of course, the planet could be made mostly of Earth-like material, and not have the gaseous atmosphere like Jupiter and Saturn. That would make it only 5 o 6 Earth diameters in size. The graphic presented in Figure 9 tells us the truth, the words mouthed by the astronomers tell us what our political leaders want us to hear, that this "Super Earth" is Not Sitchen's Planet as found on the Akkadian seal.
If Vulcan, the "Super Earth", can cast objects from the Kuiper Belt when near perihelion (where the Sun's gravity is strong), it can also cast them out when near aphelion (where the Sun's gravity is weaker). This is especially important when they are near Vulcan's resonate point 444 A.U. from the Sun. Should it cast them towards the Sun (the Sun's gravity predominates) it can catch them. And it does. Should they pass close to the Sun, its immense gravitational forces will cause them to break up when rounding it and returning them towards the heliocentric region from where they were cast. However, the orbital inclination of these tiny bodies still can be 'cranked' up and down. It is hard for astronomers to see these small objects with their telescopes, especially if they have fragmented into comet or meteor swarms. However, should some of these fragments impact Earth, they cause major changes in the weather. These are recorded in tree ring and ice core data. This 'weather change' data has revealed the precise resonate interval period anticipated, exactly two of Vulcan's orbital periods - theoretically 9938 years or measured 9938.6 years.
A catastrophe caused by the impact of comet fragments is headed our way. It is one that could return Earth's climate to one like the Younger Dryas' Ice Age. About 2016 or 2017, Tollmann's Hypothetical Bolides are anticipated to return. Should some impact Earth, the dust injected into our atmosphere would result in a new Ice Age. These boloids are related to this 'Super Earth'. Sitchin has somewhat associated cataclysms with the return of Nibiru and there is confusion if this is the Jovian like 'planet' depicted on the Akkadian seal. Actually, Nibiru is the Sumerians name for a planet that is really a comet cluster. A Jovian like 'Super Earth' would firm up this association.
The Super Earth, our Vulcan, has reasonably accurately known orbital parameters. It is really an ultra tiny brown dwarf star or Jovian sized body just like the planet depicted on the Akkadian seal. The politicians are secreting this information so this impending catastrophe can be used as a weapon against their adversaries and so they can 'cement' their control over Earth's population by controlling the cultivatable land and the habitable areas.
This is the reason that the Doppler detected on the Pioneer analog radio signals was 'rationalized away' as something being wrong with the 'laws of Physics'. This is why the Pioneer 11 radio transmitter supposedly 'failed'. This is why the 'almost Jupiter sized' IRAS detected planet was dismissed as Hot Cirrus or Distant Galaxies. Furthermore, this is the reason the existence of Eris was secreted (until the computers were hacked). The astronomers and scientists are not the 'bad guys'. J. Allen Hynek tried to tell us, so did astronomers Sheppard and Trujillo. Maybe the 'revelations' by our scientists and astronomers were accidents, but they sure seem to reveal a 'pattern of deceit'. Things like that are characteristic of our elite and their minions, our political leaders. These people are our GIANT PROBLEM.
As for the comets and giant meteors that may soon be threatening Earth, those can be handled by reasonable negotiation with the ET aliens. Just consider what has already transpired:
However, only one government official has obliquely
warned us of this impending catastrophe:
Outgoing DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano Warns Of ‘Serious’ Cyber Attack, Unprecedented Natural Disaster - Aug 27, 2013
The outgoing Homeland Security Secretary has a warning for her successor: A massive and "serious" cyber attack on the U.S. homeland is coming, and a natural disaster — the likes of which the nation has never seen — is also likely on its way.Meanwhile, the elite continue to build their secret fortresses and shelters.
You also will have to prepare for the increasing likelihood of more weather-related events of a more severe nature as a result of climate change, and continue to build the capacity to respond to potential disasters in far-flung regions of the country occurring at the same time.
Jesse and his team explore rumors that the elite are building fortified retreats and underground bunkers in remote areas of the country in preparation for a doomsday event. He travels to Ozark, Missouri to investigate the construction of an alleged 75,000 sq. ft., "single-family," fortified mansion owned by a satellite surveillance mogul and government defense contractor. Later, they are guided by a local informant to a massive underground warehouse facility, complete with railroad access, that is located in nearby Springfield, Missouri.
Mr Kissinger then added: "If you are an ordinary person, then you can prepare yourself for war by moving to the countryside and building a farm, but you must take guns with you, as the hordes of starving will be roaming. Also, even though the elite will have their safe havens and specialist shelters, they must be just as careful during the war as the ordinary civilians, because their shelters can still be compromised."
Those that rule us are not content to relax their 'Positions Of Authority'. They do not want to give up their control of the people of Earth (apparently as the ET aliens demand). They want to choose 'who lives and who dies' among us. For starters, they would rather see 1.289 billion of us die by an event like this than lose their control over us. We have known for years that Those Who Lead Us Are Our Problem. Only this time, it is one that can prove fatal to many of us.
Vatican Astronomers Ramp Up Their Search For "Brother Extraterrestrial" - March 26th, 2014
Funes, who runs the observatory that is based south of Rome and in Arizona, held out the possibility that the human race might actually be the "lost sheep" of the universe. There could be other beings "who remained in full friendship with their creator," he said.He couldn't be more correct!